翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Doe v Bennett ・ Doe v. 2themart.com Inc. ・ Doe v. Bolton ・ Doe v. Borough of Barrington ・ Doe v. Bush ・ Doe v. Cahill ・ Doe v. Chao ・ Doe v. Chiquita Brands International ・ Doe v. Exxon Mobil Corp. ・ Doe v. Gonzales ・ Doe v. Groody ・ Doe v. Holy See ・ Doe v. MySpace Inc. ・ Doe v. Reed ・ Doe v. Shurtleff ・ Doe v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority ・ Doe v. University of Michigan ・ Doe v. Unocal Corp. ・ Doe Valley, Tennessee ・ Doe's Eat Place ・ Doe-Anderson Inc. ・ Doea Tanda Mata ・ Doeberl Cup ・ Doeblin ・ Doebner reaction ・ Doebner–Miller reaction ・ Doedain District ・ Doedelzak ・ Doederleinia berycoides ・ Doedicurus Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Doe v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority ： ウィキペディア英語版 Doe v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority ''Doe v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority'', decided on December 28, 1995, was a case heard in the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. The issue before the court was whether there was a conditional right to privacy in prescription drug records. The court held that medical records, prescription drug records, and an individual's HIV status are constitutionally protected, but set aside the verdict where the opposing party established a legitimate purpose in accessing that information. ==Facts of the Case== John Doe was an employee for the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority SEPTA who had contracted Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome HIV/AIDS. Judith Pierce was the chief administrative officer for SEPTA who managed the costs of SEPTA's employee prescription drug program. This program was part of an insurance package offered to SEPTA employees. SEPTA had entered into a new prescription plan with Rite Aid, which provided Pierce with reports that included the names of the employees, linking them with the prescriptions they were filling. Doe was currently taking various prescriptions, including Retrovir, to treat his condition. Due to the delicate nature of his disease, Doe expressed concern about maintaining the secrecy of his condition. He revealed his AIDS status to Dr. Richard Press, the head of SEPTA's medical department, who in turn assured him that employee names were not typically linked to the list of prescriptions reviewed. Because of the new reports, Pierce was able to link the drugs Doe took to his name, and deduced his condition as a result. Doe became aware of this breach of his privacy, and brought this action, claiming he felt ostracized at work. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Doe v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.